The GEO agency that gets you cited by AI.

A classic agency optimizes for rankings on Google and sends a monthly PDF. A GEO agency optimizes for citations inside AI answers and gives you a live dashboard where each citation appears as it lands. The two disciplines overlap on technical foundations, since generative engines rely on traditional indexes to find their sources, but the target moves from blue links to being the source an engine chooses to quote. The reporting changes just as much. An SEO agency reports positions and traffic. We report Share of Model, meaning your share of AI citations, along with how accurately your brand is described and which competitor gets named when you are absent. That last figure is usually the most uncomfortable one to read and the most useful, because it shows precisely which questions you are losing and to whom.

Agency plans start at 690 euros per month and scale with content volume and scope. Every plan includes the Citeme platform and the free initial audit, so you can see exactly where you stand before committing to anything. If you only need the software and intend to run the work internally, the SaaS platform starts at 24 euros per month. The gap between those two figures reflects what is actually delivered: the platform measures, the agency plan measures and then executes, with a strategist, writers and a technical expert shipping every single week. One thing worth knowing when you compare quotes: a real GEO engagement includes recurring measurement across five engines, and that measurement costs money to run, because each query has to be repeated over time on every platform. Offers far below market usually skip it entirely.

Yes. Every asset we produce is yours to keep: the content, the llms.txt file, the structured data, the technical fixes applied to your stack. The engagement builds durable visibility on your own domain rather than a dependency on us, which is a deliberate choice and the reason we deploy directly into your CMS or repository rather than through a proxy layer we would control. What you lose by stopping is the ongoing measurement and the weekly execution, not the foundations themselves. In practice the technical work keeps paying long after an engagement ends, because a readable site stays readable and structured data does not decay. Content and authority need maintenance, since engines update and competitors keep publishing, so the visibility curve tends to flatten gradually rather than collapse. Nothing we build is locked behind our own infrastructure, which is a deliberate design choice rather than a commercial one.